Neoliberal pundits want to write off Bernie Sanders again. That’s no surprise | Kate Aronoff

The same media outlets that failed to predict Trump are pushing their status quo-friendly narrative on the Democratic race

Bernie Sanderss presidential campaign is collapsing. Or at least thats what a passing glimpse at the countrys leading national news outlets would have you believe.

*****************************************************

Recommended For You

TigerPress Volume 10

Premium one of a kind wordpress themes that do all the onpage seo for you including image seo, with TigerPress themes you can also generate an unlimited amount of geo targeted landing pages in any language.

1st Page Ranker - Expert Training

All in One and the Last Video Ranking Tool you will ever need!

*****************************************************

A recent CNN National poll found he dropped to just 14%, slipping behind Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren, and still farther away from frontrunner Joe Biden. Quinnipiac too! Accordingly, the Washington Posts Jennifer Rubin ominously forecasts that Sanders likely cant turn it around, while Harry Enten at CNN warns Bernie Sanders 2020 is in big trouble.But an ABC News and Washington Post poll has him just behind Biden, at 23% more than double Harris and Warren, who are tied at 11%. And hes packing rooms in Iowa, where his supporters will haggle over caucus participants next winter.

What should we make of these conflicting messages? Mainly, that lots of pundits are not especially good at what is nominally their job: interpreting American politics.

There are plenty of people in the political establishment who have it out for Sanders. But its bigger than the tantalizingly simple explanation of a mainstream media plotting with Democratic party elites against socialism; that would give both of them too much credit.

Dont get me wrong. Its worth being honest about bad poll numbers, and Sanders amid a crowded field of candidates running on ideas he helped push into the mainstream isnt picking up the kind of runaway momentum that he did in 2016. For his supporters, thats worth reckoning with and crying conspiracy wont cut it. But its also worth reckoning with the fact that the mainstream media isnt some neutral body interpreting the world.

Smoke filled rooms may well exist. But the success of the neoliberal revolution is that there are plenty of people including in the media who dont need anyone to give them orders that Sanders and his ideas should be taken down. Thats just how ideology works. By ideology, the theorist Stuart Hall wrote, I mean the mental frameworks the languages, the concepts, imagery of thought, and the systems of representation which different classes and social groups deploy in order to make sense of, figure out and render intelligible the way society works.

Its not that pundits or even their network bosses are all scheming against Sanders. Neoliberalism, the ideology that Sanders challenges, is just the water theyre swimming in. Its influence is reinforced by the fact that six corporations own about 90% of US media. Commentators, in other words, are working with a set of ideological tools and frameworks that are far from neutral.

That wasnt hard to spot from the debates. Amid staggering wealth inequality, stagnant wages and a climate crisis threatening to impale human civilization, night one host and NBC anchor Savannah Guthrie, asking Elizabeth Warren about her free college plan in the first question of the night, raised a pressing concern at least for the political establishment: What do you say to those who worry this kind of significant change could be risky to the economy?

Risk to whom, exactly? Debt forgiveness and free college probably arent so risky to the millions of people shouldering the burdens of Americas $1.6tn in student loan debt. But it certainly is to the companies like Navient getting rich off them.

Still, a major goal of any debate is to prick candidates on their policy platforms, and Guthrie went on to prod Beto ORourke on whether hed support a 70% marginal tax rate. Pundits, meanwhile, have taken candidates redistributive platforms as a personal affront. Bret Stephens moaned that Kamala Harris challenging Biden made white Americans feel racially on trial. Complaining about Democratic candidates embrace of universal healthcare and more humane immigration policies, MSNBCs Joe Scarborough another luminary attuned to the concerns of Real America counseled woke Democrats to refrain from blowing themselves up politically and re-electing Trump.

*****************************************************

Recommended For You

FlowTraffic - FB + Instagram Only

FlowTraffic is a Powerful Social Media Automation App That Uses The Power Of Images To Generate Autopilot Traffic

WP Freshstart 4 - Unlimited Sites License

Wordpress Automation Software

[ASTROBLU] XIDIO V3 Platinum lite

come with 30 days moneyback guarantee

*****************************************************

The danger here isnt just that certain status quo-friendly viewpoints are disproportionately represented in the countrys biggest outlets. Its that their own ideological blinders mean they get a lot of things wrong, and are still paid handsomely to tell Americans how to think and vote. The people counting out Sanderss campaign also took it as a given that Hillary Clinton would best Donald Trump by a landslide in 2016. Four years later we seem to be waking up on Groundhogs Day, where those same voices are positing their own reading of the countrys electoral tea leaves as definitive proof of whats going to happen five months down the line.

As New Yorks Rebecca Traister aptly pointed out in a recent essay, the pundits arent keeping up with the politicians: In all of their hand-wringing, she writes, they seem not to have noticed that assumptions about a safe center are crumbling in the hands of a new generation of political leaders willing to make a stirring case for radical ideas, like the Green New Deal and Medicare for All.

Is Bernie Sanders down for the count? Probably not. But you definitely shouldnt take the mainstream medias word for it.

  • Kate Aronoff is a freelance journalist based in New York City

Original Article : HERE ; Curated & posted using : RealSpecific

This post was curated & Posted using : RealSpecific

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!

Recommended

Postblazer Automation App Yearly

Automate your Postblazer content search and posting tasks

VidCuratorFX 2.0 - Gold Pack

VidCuratorFX 2.0 - Gold Pack gets you access to graphics to use with your videos and/or websites for yourself and your clients.

Leave a Reply